They think it's all over - it's not now.
Unlike the famous football World Cup comment in which the game was sealed with a late winning goal, HMRC has found a way of removing the goalposts completely to recover additional taxes and NIC going back as far as 1999.
For several years now HMRC has been targeting taxpayers who have been involved in avoidance schemes under which a small salary is paid and declared with the significant balance paid in the form of untaxed loans. Many taxpayers opted to settle their liabilities on the basis the loans would be treated as taxable but only for those years for which HMRC was in time to recover the duties due, the protected years. The years where HMRC was out of time, the unprotected years, HMRC took no further recovery action.
New rules were introduced and finalised in the Finance Act No2 FA2017 whereby all loans remaining untaxed would be at 5 April 2019 taxed as if they were income of the taxpayer in the tax year 2018/2019. This would include a charge for those years for which HMRC has not protected its position.
The new tax charge will apply to a loan (or loan transfer arrangement) where:
The charge will not apply if by 5 April 2019:
Many clients settled their dispute with HMRC by agreeing to pay the duties due for the protected years. However, the new rules, not envisaged at the time of settlement, mean the only way to avoid the new loan charge is to pay the tax due for the unprotected years as well. This can be achieved through a voluntary settlement with HMRC, see paragraph 2.1 of this link: Disguised remuneration: detailed settlement terms
The deadline for registering an interest in settling with HMRC was 31 May 2018 followed by the provision of relevant information soon after. A failure to register means the loan charge will kick in.
There may also be IHT issues to consider particularly if a trust was involved such as in an EBT arrangement.
Some clients may need to negotiate a time to pay arrangement in view of this unexpected additional liability.
Ex NAO chief to lead independent review of loan charge
The former head of the National Audit Office (NAO), Sir Amyas Morse, will head up the independent review into the controversial loan charge and is set to report by mid-November.
Following sustained criticism of the loan charge rules, effective from 5 April 2019, to claw back income tax and national insurance contributions (NICs) from contractors paid in the form of loans or quasi loans, known as disguised remuneration, the government was forced to announce an independent review. The review will consider whether or not the Loan Charge was the right way to deal with individuals’ use of the disputed tax avoidance schemes and also whether changes announced by the government address legitimate concerns about the impact on individuals, including affordability for those affected.
While the review is under way the loan charge remains in force.
HMRC has issued a notice confirming that ‘if you are not settling your disguised remuneration scheme use, you will still need to complete an additional information return by 30 September 2019. If you fail to do so HMRC reserves the right to charge penalties.
The review will focus on the impact on those individuals who were using the schemes directly, and whether the loan charge policy is an appropriate way of dealing with disguised remuneration loan schemes. This reflects main concerns raised by MPs and campaigners about the loan charge.
The disguised remuneration loan charge was introduced in 2016 to tackle contrived schemes where a person’s income was paid as a loan which did not have to be repaid. That gave users three years to either repay the loan, settle the tax due with HMRC, or face an income tax charge in one tax year on the total amount of outstanding loans.
Around 40,000 people are affected by the loan charge, although some taxpayers have settled with HMRC during the three-year settlement agreement period.
It's very important for those subject to the loan charge to follow the published advice which means those who have already settled should do nothing and those who have settled and are paying by instalments should continue to do so. Those who have provided all the required information by 5 April 2019 and are waiting to finalise a settlement can continue to do so if they wish.
However, HMRC has indicated that they may wish to wait for the Government's response to the review before settling.
The review will conclude by mid-November to give taxpayers certainty ahead of the 31 January 2020 self-assessment deadline. Financial Secretary to the Treasury Jesse Norman said: ‘These disguised remuneration schemes are highly contrived attempts to avoid tax, but it is right to consider if the loan charge is the appropriate way of tackling them. The Government fully appreciates the concerns expressed by individuals, campaigners, and MPs who have raised concerns about the loan charge. Sir Amyas is known and respected across parliament for his expertise and independence of mind. The government looks forward to his report as it continues to tackle these and other tax avoidance schemes.
"We understand that people sometimes make mistakes in their dealings with HMRC and that HMRC make mistakes in dealing with taxpayers. Many people do not know how to deal with HMRC or who to turn to for help resolve the tax dispute.
Our firm of tax advisors specialise in resolving people's problems with HMRC. We have extensive expertise in dealing with all forms of tax investigations and tax disputes as well as with taking matters to the Tax Tribunal where agreement cannot be reached.
We deal both directly with the individual who is under enquiry and also work with many firms of accountants supporting them in dealing with HMRC disputes and advising them on how to handle HRMC to get the best result.
The fact is that proper management of HMRC is the best way of reducing the tax, interest and penalty as well as the time taken in resolving any tax dispute.
Our expert team are none judgemental and rigorously defend your position within the scope and parameter of the law. We take control and manage the process to minimise the interruptions that any form of tax investigation causes to an individual's life and business."